Characterizing Conclusive Approximations by Logical Formulae
نویسندگان
چکیده
Considering an initial set of terms E, a rewriting relation R and a goal set of terms Bad, reachability analysis in term rewriting tries to answer to the following question: does there exists at least one term of Bad that can be reached from E using the rewriting relation R? Some of the approaches try to show that there exists at least one term of Bad reachable from E using the rewriting relation R by computing the set of reachable terms. Some others tackle the unreachability problem i.e. no term of Bad is reachable by rewriting from E. For the latter, over-approximations are computed. A main obstacle is to be able to compute an over-approximation precise enough that does not intersect Bad i.e. a conclusive approximation. This notion of precision is often defined by a very technical parameter of techniques implementing this over-approximation approach. In this paper, we propose a new characterization of conclusive approximations by logical formulae generated from a new kind of automata called symbolic tree automata. Solving a such formula leads automatically to a conclusive approximation without extra technical parameters.
منابع مشابه
Utilizing Moment Invariants and Gröbner Bases to Reason About Shapes
Shapes such as triangles or rectangles can be defined in terms of geometric properties invariant under a group of transformations. Complex shapes can be described by logic formulae w i th simpler shapes as the atoms. A standard technique for computing invariant properties of simple shapes is the method of moment invariants, known since the early sixties. We generalize this technique to shapes d...
متن کاملA Temporal Graph Logic for Verification of Graph Transformation Systems
We extend our approach for verifying properties of graph transformation systems using suitable abstractions. In the original approach properties are specified as formulae of a propositional temporal logic whose atomic predicates are monadic second-order graph formulae. We generalize this aspect by considering more expressive logics, where edge quantifiers and temporal modalities can be interlea...
متن کاملAnytime Approximate Modal Reasoning
Propositional modal logics have two independent sources of complexity: unbounded logical omniscience and unbounded logical introspection. This paper discusses an approximation method to tame both of them, by merging propositional approximations with a new technique tailored for multi-modal logics. It provides both skeptical and credulous approximations (or approximation that are neither of the ...
متن کاملImplementing Modal and Relevance Logics in a Logical Framework
We present a framework for machine implementation of both partial and complete fragments of large families of non-classical logics such as modal, relevance, and intuitionistic logics. We decompose a logic into two interacting parts, each a natural deduction system: a base logic of labelled formulae, and a theory of labels characterizing the properties of the Kripke models. Our approach is modul...
متن کاملNatural Deduction for Non-Classical Logics
We present a framework for machine implementation of families of non-classical logics with Kripke-style semantics. We decompose a logic into two interacting parts, each a natural deduction system: a base logic of labelled formulae, and a theory of labels characterizing the properties of the Kripke models. By appropriate combinations we capture both partial and complete fragments of large famili...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011